Wednesday, June 15, 2005

E in conversation

30. "Of course Michael Jackson didn't have a jury of his peers. They'd be hard pressed to find a jury of his peers even at Barnum and Bailey."

Said on 6/13/05 to my wife in a conversation about the Michael Jackson Child Molestation Trial. She said he wasn't going to get a fair shake because the jury wasn't a "jury of his peers". I agreed. A jury of his peers would consist mostly of nut jobs. The courts found him innocent on all ten counts. He should still be punished just on the merits of his character alone.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home